Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 23 | 24 || 26 |
2002, Systemafederalnoy finansovoy pomoschi subyektam RF i fiskalnoye povedeniyeregionalnykh vlastey v 1994– 2000 godakh // Voprosy ekonomiki. – ., 2002. – No. 8. – P. 31–50.
  • Kohlscheen, Emanuel (2003), Do Constitutional Side Payments InduceSubnational Bailouts Institute for International Economic Studies, StockholmUniversity.
  • Kolstad, C. and F. Wolak, 1983, Competition in InterregionalTaxation: The Case of Western Coal, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 91, pp.443–360.
  • Kornai J. (1980). Economics of Shortage. Amsterdam:North-Holland.
  • Kornai, J., Maskin, E., and Roland, G., 2003, Understanding theSoft Budget Constraint. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. XLI (December):1095–1136.
  • Kornai, Janos Contradictions and Dilemmas (Cambridge, Mass.: TheMIT Press, 1986); see also Chandler, The Changing Role of the Market inNational Economies, p. 17.
  • Kornai, Janos, 1979, Resource-Constrained VersusDemand-Constrained Systems, Econometrica 47 (4): 801–19.
  • Kozarzewski, P. (2002). Corporate Governance and SecondaryPrivatization in Poland: Legal Framework and Changes in Ownership Structure.Working Paper. Warsaw.
  • Ladd, H., 1975, Local Education Expenditures, Fiscal Capacity, andthe Composition of the Property Tax Base, National Tax Journal, Vol. 28, pp.145–158.
  • Lall, R., and B. Hofman, 1995, Decentralization and the GovernmentDeficit in China, In Jayanta Roy ed. Macroeconomic Management and FiscalDecentralization, Washington D.C: World Bank Institute of the World Bank.
  • Lewis, C. W., 1994, Municipal Bankruptcy and the States:Authorization to File Under Chapter 9, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 30, pp.3–26.
  • Li, D. (1992). Public ownership as a condition for the soft budgetconstraint, University of Michigan working paper.
  • Litwack, J., Central Control of regional Budget: Theory withApplications to Russia, OECD.
  • Logan, Robet R. Fiscal Illusion and the Grantor Government //Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, No. 6 (Dec. 1986): 1304–1318.
  • Lugovoy O., P. Kadochnikov, S. Sinelnikov-Murylev S, I. TruninOtsenka nalogovogo potentsiala i rashodnykh potrebnostey subyektov RossiyskoyFederatsii. – .:Rossiysko-Kanadskiy konsortsium po voprosam prikladnykh ekonomicheskikhissledovaniy, 2001.
  • Maskin, Eric S., 1999, Recent Theoretical Work on the Soft BudgetConstraint", American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol.89(2), pp. 421–425,May.
  • McCarten, W. J., 2003, The Challenge of Fiscal Discipline in theIndian States, In Rodden,J., Eskeland, G. S. and Litvack, J. ed. FiscalDecentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budge Constraints, The MIT PressCambridge, Massachusetts London, England.
  • McGuire, M., A Method for Estimating the Effect of a Subsidy onthe Receiver’sResource Constraint: with an Application to U.S. Local Governments1964–1971, Journal ofPublic Economics, Vol. 10, (1978), 25–44.
  • Morgan, D., Vasche, J.D., Horseracing Demand, Parimutuel Taxationand State Revenue Potential. // National Tax Journal, 32, pp. 185–194.
  • Murphy, R., 1995, Fiscal Decentralization in Latin America,Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press for the Inter-AmericanDevelopment Bank.
  • Musgrave, R. (1959). Approach to a Fiscal Theory of PoliticalFederalism.
  • Musgrave, R., 1959, The Theory of Public Finance: A Study inPublic Economy, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • O’Brien,P., Yeung-Nan Shieh, Utility Functions and Fiscal Illusion from Grants,National Tax Journal, Vol. 43, (1990).
  • O’Connell, S. and D. Wetzel, 2003, Systemic Soft Budget Constraintsin Ukraine, In Rodden, J., Eskeland, G. S. and Litvack, J. ed. FiscalDecentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budge Constraints, The MIT PressCambridge, Massachusetts London, England.
  • Oates, W., 1972, Fiscal Federalism, New-York: Harcourt BraceJovanovich.
  • O'Connell, M. and R. C. Picker, 1933, When Cities Go Broke: AConceptual Introduction to Municipal Bankruptcy, The University of Chicago LawReview, 60, pp. 425–496.
  • Oliviera, J. do Carmo, 1998, Financial Crises of SubnationalGovernments in Brazil, World Bank.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1998, OECDEconomic Surveys, 1997–1998: Germany, Paris: OECD.
  • Pal-Kovacs, I., 1998, The Legal and Regulatory Background ofFiscal Decentralization and the Characteristic Features of Its Operation inHungary (Background paper to World Bank, 1999).
  • Peralta-Ramos, M., 1992, The Political Economy of Argentina.Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
  • Perry, D.

    B., 1997, Financing the Canadian Federation, 1867 to1995 (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation).

  • Pettersson-Lidbom, Per & Dahlberg, Matz, 2003. An EmpiricalApproach for Evaluating Soft Budget Constraints, Working Paper Series 2003:28,Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
  • Polackova, B., Hanah, Papp, A., and A. Schick, 1999, Hungary:Fiscal Risks and the Quality of Fiscal Adjustment (World Bank).
  • Post-Privatization Period in Eastern Europe: a Chance forEnterprises and Shareholders (1997). Proceedings of the InternationalConference Chisinau, Moldova Republic, October 15–17 / Edited by Valentin Railean,Ivan Samson.
  • Poterba, James M. 1995. Balanced Budget Rules and Fiscal Policy:Evidence from the States. National Tax Journal 48(3): 329–36.
  • Prud'homme, R., 1995, The Dangers of Decentralization, The WorldBank Research Observer 10, 201–220.
  • Qian Y.Y., Xu C.G. Why China’s Economic Reforms Differ: TheM-Form Hierarchy and Entry/Expansion of the Nonstate Sector // The Economics ofTransition. Vol. 1. 2 (June 1993). P. 135–170.
  • Qian, Y., and G. Roland, Federalism and the Soft BudgetConstraint, American Economic Review, 88,5:1143-61, December 1998.
  • Ratchford, B. U., 1941, American State Debts, Durham, NC: DukeUniversity Press.
  • Rattso, J., 2003, Vertical Imbalance and Fiscal Behavior in aWelfare State: Norway, In Rodden, J., Eskeland, G. S. and Litvack, J.ed., Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budge Constraints, TheMIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England.
  • Rodden, J., 1999, Soft Budget Constraints in Decentralized FiscalSystems, Paper prepared for American Political Science Association, Atlanta,September.
  • Rodden, J., 1999b, Creating a More Perfect Union: ElectoralIncentives and the Reform of Federal Systems, paper presented at the annualmeeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 16,1999.
  • Rodden, J., 2003, Federalism and Bailouts in Brazil, In Rodden,J.,Eskeland, G. S. and Litvack,J. ed. Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge ofHard Budge Constraints, The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London,England.
  • Rodden, J., 2003, Soft Budget Constraints and German Federalism,In Rodden, J., Eskeland, G. S. and Litvack, J. ed. Fiscal Decentralization andthe Challenge of Hard Budge Constraints, The MIT Press Cambridge, MassachusettsLondon, England.
  • Rodden, J., Eskeland, G. S. and Litvack, J., 2003, FiscalDecentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budge Constraints, The MIT PressCambridge, Massachusetts London, England.
  • Rodden, Jonathan, 2001, The Dilemma of Fiscal Federalism: Grantsand Fiscal Performance Around the World. Mimo. Department of Political Studies,MIT.
  • Romer, T., Rosenthal, H., An Institutional Theory of the Effect ofIntergovernmental Grants, National Tax Journal, Vol. 33, (1980).
  • Sato, M., Fiscal externalities and Efficient Transfers in aFederation, International Tax and Public Finance, (1999).
  • Schaffer, Mark E. (1989). The credible-commitment problem in thecenter–enterpriserelationship. Journal of Comparative Economics 13, 359–382
  • Schlesinger, A. M., 1945, The Age of Jackson, Boston: Little,Brown and Co.
  • Schwallie, D., A Theory of Intergovernmental Grants and theirEffect on Aggregate Grantor-Recipient Spending, Public Finance Quarterly, Vol.5, No.3, (Jul., 1987), 322–338.
  • Scott, A., The Evaluation of Federal Grants, Economica, (Nov.,1952).
  • Shah, A., 1991, The New Fiscal Federalism in Brazil, Washington,D.C.: World Bank.
  • Shah, A., 1998, Fiscal Federalism and Macroeconomic Governance:For Better or Worse, World Bank.
  • Sinelnikov-Murylev S.G. (1995). Byudzhentny krizis v Rossii:1985–1995 gody.– .:Evrazia.
  • Singh, N., Thomas, R., Matching Grants versus Block Grants withImperfect Information, National Tax Journal, Vol. 42, (1989).
  • Steinfeld, E., 1999, Forging Reform in China: The Fate ofState-Owned Industry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stewart, C., 1989, Budget Reform Politics: The Design of theAppropriations Process in the House of Representatives, 1865–1921, Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
  • Strauss, R., The Impact of Block Grants on Local Expenditures andProperty Tax Rates, Journal of Public Economics Vol. 3, (1974), 269–284.
  • Streit um Hilfen für das Saarland und Bremen, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,Feb.25.1998.
  • Tassonyi, A., 1994, Debt Limits and Supervision: An Issue inProvincial-Municipal Relationships in Times of Fiscal Crisis – A Comparisons of the 1930's andthe 1990's, Government and Competitiveness Discussion Paper, School of PolicyStudies, Queen's University, Kingston.
  • Tassonyi, A., 1997, Financing Municipal Infrastructure inCanada’sCity-Regions, in Paul A.R.
    Hobson and France St-Hilaire, eds., Urban Governanceand Finance: A Question of Who Does What (Montreal, IRPP), pp.171–205.
  • Ter-Minassian, T., 1997, Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice,International National Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.
  • Tiebout, C., 1956, A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures, Journal ofPolitical Economy, 64: 416–24.
  • Treisman, D., After the Deluge, Regional Crises and PoliticalConsolidation in Russia, University of Michigan (1999).
  • Trends and Policies in Privatization (1994). Vol. II. No 1.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Centre for Co-operationwith Economies in Transition.
  • Trunin I., A. Katamadze, V. Nazarov. Mezhbudzhentnye otnoshenia isubnatsionalnye finansy // Rossiyaskaya ekonomika v 2004 godu: tendentsii iperspektivy. – .:IEPP, 2005 ., pp. 75–146, www.iet.ru.
  • Vigneault M., 2005, Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and theSoft Budget Constraint.
  • Von Hagen, Jurgen and Ian J. Harden, 1995, Budget processes andcommitment to fiscal discipline. // European Economic Review, No. 39 (1995):771–779.
  • Von Hagen, Jurgen and Matz Dahlberg, 2002, Swedish LocalGovernment: Is There A Bailout Problem Prepared for the Project on FiscalFederalism in Sweden. Center for Business and Policy Studies.
  • Wagner, R.E., 1976, Revenue Structure, Fiscal Illusion andBudgetary Choice, Public Choice, Vol. 25, pp. 45–61.
  • Wallis, J., A. Grinath, and R. Sylla, 1998, Debt, Default, andRevenue Structure: Public Lands, Property Taxes, and the Debt Crisis in Indianaand the North in 1841, Mimeo, University of Maryland, Department of Economics.
  • Wang, S., 1997, China’s Fiscal Reform in 1994: An Initial Assessment, Asian Survey(U.S.) 37: 801–17.
  • Wang, Y., 1991, Economic Reform, Fixed Capital InvestmentExpansion, and Inflation: A Behavior Model Based on the Chinese Experience,China Economic Review, 2(1), 3–27.
  • Webb, S. B., 2003, Argentina: Hardening the Provincial BudgetConstraint, In Rodden, J., Eskeland, G. S. and Litvack, J. ed. FiscalDecentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budge Constraints, The MIT PressCambridge, Massachusetts London, England.
  • Wetzel, D. and A. Papp, 2003, Strengthening Hard BudgetConstraints in Hungary, In Rodden,J., Eskeland, G. S. and Litvack,J.ed. FiscalDecentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budge Constraints, The MIT PressCambridge, Massachusetts London, England.
  • Wildasin, D., 1989, Interjurisdictional Capital Mobility: FiscalExternality and a Corrective Subsidy, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 25, pp.193–212.
  • Wildasin, D., 1997, Externalities and Bailouts, Hard and SoftBudget Constraint in Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations, The World Bank,Development Research Group.
  • Wilde, J., Grants-in-Aid: the Analytics of Design and Response,National Tax Journal, Vol. 24, (1971).
  • Wilde, J., The Expenditure Effects of Grant-in-Aid Programs,National Tax Journal, Vol. 21, (1968).
  • Wilde, J., The Expenditure Effects of Grant-in-AidPrograms.
  • Wilde, J.A., 1968, The Expenditure Effects of Grant-in-aidPrograms, National Tax Journal, XXI, September, 340–348.
  • Willis, E., Garman, C., and S. Haggard, 1997, The Politics ofDecentralization in Latin America, Department of Political Science, Universityof California – SanDiego, LaJolla, CA. Processed.
  • Wilson, J., 1999, Theories of Tax Competition, National TaxJournal, Vol. 52, pp. 269–304.
  • World Bank, 1996, The Chinese Economy: Fighting Inflation,Deepening Reforms, A World Bank Country Study.
  • World Bank, 1999, Intergovernmental Finance in Hungary: ContinuousProgress, Continuous Change and Options for Reform, Subnational DevelopmentProgram. DRAFT. (5/07/99).
  • Zampelli, E., Resource Fungibility, the Flypaper Effect, and theExpenditure Impact of Grants-in-Aid, The Review of Economics and Statistics,Vol. 68, Issue 1 (Feb., 1986), 33–40.
  • Zhuravskaya, ., Makrushin, ., Slinko, I. (2003). Prichiny isledstviya slabosti byudzhentnykh stimulov v Rossii na mestnom urovne , .TSEFIR.

  • 1 VoirMaskin (1999)

    Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 23 | 24 || 26 |

    2011 www.dissers.ru -

    , .
    , , , , 1-2 .