3. anty lam. increase in utilization of dental sealant. J consure material. this fluoride release is an important role in temp dent pract. www.thejcdp.com. 2008; 9: 1-7.
helping to heal remineralizes dentin and enamel [6-8].
4. Jenkins S., geurink k.V., altenhoff l. (2002). oral health the benefits of fluoride release from pit fissure materiprograms in the community. in: community oral health pracal, following higher concentration of fluoroapatite. fluoride tice for dental hygienist. 1st ed. philadelphia: w.b.Saunders co.
will act as a catalyst for remineralization of demineralized 5. lewis J.M. Morgan M.V. (1994). a critical review of methtooth surfaces. adjacent tooth surface in contact with pit ods for the economic evaluation of fissure sealants; community fissure material will have potential to remineralize [8-12].
dental health; 11(2): 79-82.
in the literature, the choice between the invasive and 6. Jayanth V. k, Mark d. S. a contemporary perspective on dental Sealants: changes in the prevalence and distribution of noninvasive pit fissure sealant material remains a matter caries, the effectiveness of sealants, and guidelines for use are of debate. in the present investigation the complete loss reviewed. J of the califor dent ass. 1998: http://www.cda.org/ of pit fissure sealant from occlusal surface was considlibrary/cda_member/pubs/journal/jour598/sealants.html ered that the adhesion of material to the wall of enamel 7. garcia-godoy f., harris n.o., helm d.M. pit-and-fissure sealants. in: harris no, garcia-godoy f. primary preventive was better, and the other side describe that the wall dentistry. 6th ed. new Jersey: pearson-prentice hall; 2004. Р.
enamel was not dry [13-16]. there seems to be a need 285-318.
for defined guidelines for sealant application criteria and 8. boksman l. et al. (1987). clinical evaluation of glass ionomer policy both locally and nationwide. the reduction of oc- cement as a fissure sealant. quintessence interational; 18: 707-9.
9. brooks J.d. et al. (1988). a pilot study of three tinted unclusal caries following dental sealant application is highly filled pit and fissure sealants: 23 month results in Milwaukee.
significant and dependent upon dental sealant retention, wisconsin. clin prev dent; 10(1):18-22.
though the occlusal caries management may be im10. komatsu h. et al. (1990). glass ionomer cement designed proved by shifting the sealant policy from the traditional for fissure sealant: 3-years clinical results. Journal of dental Research; 69: 1046-1051.
approach of prevention to interception, such as applying 11. Shimokobe et al. (1986). clinical evaluation of glassthe sealants over detected or suspected enamel caries ionomer cement used for sealants; Journal of dental Research;
lesions instead of sealing sound teeth [13, 14, 17]. while 65:812-816.
in table 3 indicated the mean decay was decrease sig- 12. houpt M. Shey z. effectiveness of fissure sealant after six years. pediatric dentistry 1983; 5: 104-106.
nificantly, one of the reason is the parents of student after 13. Mertz-fairhurst e.J., et al. (1992). a comparative study receive the dental health education from dentist, they are of two pit and fissure sealants: six year results in augusta, ga.
looking for dental treatment and dental prevention due Journal of the american dentistry association; 105: 237-239.
to pit and fissure sealant. hence, dental health educa- 14. Simonsen R.J. (1991): Retention and effectiveness of dental sealant affter 15 years. Journal of the american dental tion and dental preventive method due to pit and fissure association; 122: 34-42.
sealant which informed to parents can save money on 15. wright g.z., et al. (1988). a comparison between aouhealthcare expenditures by avoiding more labor intentopolymerizing and visible light activated sealants. clinical and sive and invasive dental procedures such as restorative, preventive dentistry; 10(1): 14-17.
16. benedict i.t. (2001). Recommendations and Systematic endodontic, and surgical care [18-19].
evidence Reviews, guide to community preventive Services Conclusion. this research result demonstrates that oral health. hStat:guide to clinical preventive Services, 3rd conservative cavity preparation with sealing for prevenedition. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgihighlight=Ser tion is a successful technique, which conserves valuable vices,preventive,guide, 17. wendt l.k., kock g., birkhed d. on the retention and tooth structure. the technique is particularly recomeffectiveness of fissure sealant in permanent molars after 15-mended, even though there is about 12.77%-15.69% years: a cohort study. community dent oral epidemiol. 2001;
were found as complete loss of sealant material. how29(4):302-7.
ever, adequate isolation is the most critical aspect of the 18. yazici a.R., arlin k., elik., gl., berrin d. a twoyear clinical evaluation of pit and fissure sealants placed with and sealant application process. therefore, placing sealants without air abrasion pretreatment in teenagers. J am dent asmaterial in deep pit-fissure has to pay attention for consoc.2006 ; 137 : 1401-5.
trollable isolation. with these approaches, the utilization 19. Sharon S.c., connolly i.M., Murphree k.R. a Review of of dental sealants will improve the oral health among the the literature: the economic impact of preventive dental hygiene Services. J dent hyg. 2005; 79:1-11.
next generation of school children in indonesia.
удК616.31 Оригинальная статья оСоБенноСти редУкции жевательного аППарата У жителей г. ПенЗы и ПенЗенСкой оБлаСти О.В. Калмин – ГОУ ВПО Пензенский государственный университет, заведующий кафедрой анатомии человека, профессор, доктор медицинских наук; И.В. Маланьин – ГОУ ВПО Пензенский государственный университет, профессор кафедры стоматологии, доктор медицинских наук; Л.А. Зюлькина – ГОУ ВПО Пензенский государственный университет, ассистент кафедры стоматологии; П.В. Иванов – ГОУ ВПО Пензенский государственный университет, заведующий кафедрой стоматологии, кандидат медицинских наук.
CHARACteRIStICS OF MAStICAtORY APPARAtUS ReDUCtION AMONG POPULAtION OF PeNZA AND PeNZA ReGION O.V. Kalmin – Penza State University, Head of Department of Normal Human Anatomy, Professor, Doctor of Medical Science;
I.V. Malanjin – Penza State University, Department of Stomatology, Professor, Doctor of Medical Science; L.A. Zyulkina – Penza State University, Department of Stomatology, Assistant; P.V. Ivanov – Penza State University, Head of Department of Stomatology, Candidate of Medical Science.
Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал. 2010. Том 6. № 2.
For article: Risqa Rina Darwita, Iwany Amalliah. Preventive Intervention of Pit Fissure Sealant to Reduce New Dental Caries Incidence in the Student of Sumbangsih Primary Schools Jakarta. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research, 2010, vol. 6, № 2, p. 386-Figure 1. The distribution of students as subject’s research in Primary School of Sumbangsih in Kemang & Grogol 38% 62% Sumbangsih Kemang Sumbangsih Grogol Figure.2. the Distribution of retention of pit-fissure sealant in 822 tooth of children age 7-11 years old full retention partial loss complete loss Pit-fissure sealant material retention : p< 0.001` Total number of tooth (%) Table 1. Distribution of total number tooth indicated for Pit & Fissure sealant by age No Age (Year) Number of tooth 1. 7 2. 8 3. 9 4. 10 5. 11 Table.2. the number of occlusal sealant retention rates in 822 tooth first molar permanent of student age 7-11 year in Sumbangsih Primary School The number of occlusal sealant retention rates full retention partial loss complete loss Age (year) P tooth tooth % tooth % % Value 7 72 8.75 22 2.68 29 3.8 130 15.81 <0.001 95 11.56 105 12.9 174 21.17 <0.001 55 6.69 129 15.10 4 0.49 1 0.12 4 0.11 0 0 1 0.12 1 0.Table.3. the number of Decay of student in Sumbangsih Primary School Jakarta after 1 year Decay Score Sumbangsih Primary School Kemang and Grogol Age (year) First Screening Second Screening p Value 7 0 8 18 4 < 0.9 29 10 4 11 2