WWW.DISSERS.RU


...
    !

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 12 | 13 ||

CIS, Asia 2/ 481 347 327 CIS, Europe 2/ 2,700 2,007 1,805 1, Annex I countries 3/, 4/ 11,638 11,872 12,594 13,Indicator 7.3 Indicator 7.Proportion of fish stocks within safe biological limits Consumption of ozone-depleting substances Percentage of fish stocks within safe biological limits All ODSs consumption in ODP-tonnes 1990 2000 1990 2000 Total 81 72 Developing Regions 247,501 212,466 71, Fully exploited 50 47 Northern Africa 6,203 8,129 2, Under- and moderately exploited 31 25 Sub-Saharan Africa 23,449 9,561 2, Latin America and the Caribbean 76,048 31,087 11, Eastern Asia 103,217 105,762 38,Indicator 7. Southern Asia 3,338 28,161 7,Proportion of total water resources used Surface water and groundwater withdrawal as percentage South-Eastern Asia 21,108 16,809 4,of total actual renewable water resources (TARWR), around Western Asia 11,435 11,855 4, Developing Regions 6. Oceania 47 129 Northern Africa 76.Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) 139,454 27,585 1, Sub-Saharan Africa 2. CIS, Asia 2,738 928 Latin America and the Caribbean 1. CIS, Europe 136,716 26,657 1, Eastern Asia 21.Developed Regions1/ 826,801 24,060 10, Southern Asia 26. Transition countries of South-Eastern Europe 6,239 966 South-Eastern Asia 4.Least Developed Countries (LDCs) 1,463 4,766 1, Western Asia 47.Landlocked Developing Countries (LLDCs) 3,354 2,386 Oceania 0.Small Island Developing States (SIDS) 7,162 2,125 1, Commonwealth of Independent States 5.1/ Includes transition countries of South-Eastern Europe.

Developed Regions 9. Transition countries of South-Eastern Europe 11. Least Developed Countries (LDCs) 3. Landlocked Developing Countries (LLDCs) 8. Small Island Developing States (SIDS) 1.Target 7.B (b) Terrestrial Reduce biodiversity loss, achieving, by 2010, a significant reduction in Terrestrial protected area ratio to total surface area, percentage the rate of loss 1990 2000 2007 Total Indicator 7.World 6.3 9.0 10.0 12.Proportion of terrestrial and marine areas protected Developing Regions 7.1 11.0 12.6 14.(a) Terrestrial and marine Protected area ratio (terrestrial and marine combined) to total territorial area, Northern Africa 2.1 3.1 3.4 3.percentage 1/ Including Sub-Saharan Africa 9.1 9.6 10.1 12.Excluding undated undated Latin America and the Caribbean 8.2 15.5 20.2 22.protected areas protected areas Eastern Asia 7.4 10.5 11.5 14.1990 2000 2007 Total Southern Asia 4.5 5.3 5.6 5.World 2/ 6.0 8.6 9.9 12. South-Eastern Asia 5.4 11.0 11.8 15. Developing Regions 6.1 9.6 11.3 13. Western Asia 4.0 19.1 19.1 19. Northern Africa 2.1 3.1 3.4 3. Oceania 1.8 2.5 2.6 8. Sub-Saharan Africa 8.5 9.0 9.5 11. Commonwealth of Independent States 1.7 2.6 2.6 7. Latin America and the Caribbean 7.3 14.4 18.8 21. Developed Regions 10.0 12.1 12.7 16. Eastern Asia 7.0 9.9 10.9 14. Least Developed Countries (LDCs) 8.3 9.2 9.6 11. Southern Asia 4.3 5.1 5.4 5. Landlocked Developing Countries (LLDCs) 8.1 10.6 10.7 11. South-Eastern Asia 2.6 5.3 6.0 7. Small Island Developing States (SIDS) 5.4 26.4 26.6 28. Western Asia 3.7 17.8 17.8 17.(c) Marine Oceania 0.4 0.9 7.1 8.Marine protected area ratio to total territorial waters, percentage Commonwealth of Independent States 1.7 2.8 2.8 7.1990 2000 2007 Total Developed Regions 10.3 12.8 14.5 18.World 3.9 6.4 9.6 9. Least Developed Countries (LDCs) 7.5 8.3 9.5 10. Developing Regions 0.6 2.2 4.3 4. Landlocked Developing Countries (LLDCs) 8.1 10.6 10.7 11. Northern Africa 0.3 2.6 3.4 4. Small Island Developing States (SIDS) 3.1 13.9 16.8 17. Sub-Saharan Africa 0.5 1.4 1.8 1.1/ Differences in figures when compared to the statistical annex of the 2007 MDG Report are due to new available data and revised methodologies.

Latin America and the Caribbean 1.5 7.3 10.0 10.2/ Includes territories that are not considered in the calculations of regional and Developed and Developing Regions aggregates. Eastern Asia 0.4 0.6 0.6 0. Southern Asia 1.2 1.3 1.3 1. South-Eastern Asia 0.3 0.7 1.3 1. Western Asia 0.6 1.7 1.7 1. Oceania 0.1 0.6 8.1 8. Commonwealth of Independent States 2.3 5.6 5.6 5. Developed Regions 11.9 16.6 23.5 23. Least Developed Countries (LDCs) 0.4 1.1 8.7 8. Landlocked Developing Countries (LLDCs) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. Small Island Developing States (SIDS) 0.9 1.8 7.2 7.1/ Some LLDCs have territorial water claims within inland seas.

Indicator 7.7 Indicator 7.Proportion of species threatened with extinction Proportion of population using an improved sanitation facility Percentage of species not expected to go extinct in the near future1/ Percentage of population using an improved sanitation facility 1990 1994 Total Urban Rural Total Urban Rural World 92.19 91.World 54 78 36 62 79 Developed Regions 93.50 93. Developing Regions 41 66 28 53 71 Developing Regions 92.54 92. Northern Africa 62 82 44 76 90 Northern Africa 97.60 97. Sub-Saharan Africa 26 40 20 31 42 Sub-Saharan Africa 93.75 93. Latin America and the Caribbean 68 81 35 79 86 Latin America and the Caribbean 93.10 92. Eastern Asia 48 61 43 65 74 Eastern Asia 96.16 95. Southern Asia 21 53 10 33 57 Southern Asia 95.95 95. South-Eastern Asia 50 74 40 67 78 South-Eastern Asia 93.37 92. Western Asia 79 93 56 84 94 Western Asia 97.53 96. Oceania 52 80 44 52 80 Oceania 91.86 91. Commonwealth of Independent 90 95 81 89 94 States Commonwealth of Independent States 96.36 95. Commonwealth of Independent 95 97 93 93 95 1/ States, Asia IUCN Red List Index values for birds plus the number of non-Data Deficient species.

Commonwealth of Independent 89 94 77 88 94 States, Europe Target 7.C Developed Regions 99 100 96 99 100 Halve, by 2015, the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation Target 7.D Indicator 7.By 2020, to have achieved a significant improvement in the lives of at Proportion of population using an improved drinking water source least 100 million slum dwellers Percentage of population using an improved drinking water source Indicator 7. 1990 Proportion of urban population living in slums Total Urban Rural Total Urban Rural (No new global or regional data are available. Data presented are from report.) World 77 95 63 87 96 Percentage of urban population living in slums 1/, 2/ Developing Regions 71 93 59 84 94 1990 2001 Northern Africa 88 95 82 92 96 Developing Regions 46.5 42.7 36. Sub-Saharan Africa 49 82 35 58 81 Northern Africa 37.7 28.2 14. Latin America and the Caribbean 84 94 61 92 97 Sub-Saharan Africa 72.3 71.9 62. Eastern Asia 68 97 55 88 98 Latin America and the Caribbean 35.4 31.9 27. Southern Asia 74 91 68 87 95 Eastern Asia 41.1 36.4 36. South-Eastern Asia 73 92 64 86 92 Southern Asia 63.7 59.0 42. Western Asia 86 95 70 90 95 South-Eastern Asia 36.8 28.0 27. Oceania 51 92 39 50 91 Commonwealth of Independent Western Asia 26.4 25.7 24.93 97 84 94 99 States Commonwealth of Independent Oceania 24.5 24.1 24.87 95 80 88 98 States, Asia Commonwealth of Independent States, Commonwealth of Independent Asia 30.3 29.4 29.95 98 87 97 99 States, Europe Commonwealth of Independent States, Developed Regions 98 100 95 99 100 Europe 6.0 6.0 6.1/ Represented by the urban population living in households with at least one of the four characteristics: lack of access to improved drinking water, lack of access to improved sanitation, overcrowding (three or more persons per room) and dwellings made of nondurable material.

2/ The decrease in the percentage of populations living in slum conditions is mostly due to a change in the definition of adequate sanitation. In 2005, only a proportion of households using pit latrines were considered slum households, whereas in 1990 and 2001 all households using pit latrines were counted as slum households. The change affects estimates mostly in those countries where the use of pit latrines is more widespread, as in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Indicator 8.Proportion of bilateral official development assistance of OECD/DAC Goal donors that is untied Develop a global partnership for development All OECD/DAC countries 1/ Target 8.A 1990 2003 2004 2005 Develop further an open, rule-based, predictable, non-discriminatory Percentage of aid that is untied 67.6 91.8 91.3 92.3 94.trading and financial system.

In billion US $ 16.3 30.1 30.8 48.9 53.Includes a commitment to good governance, development, and 1/ Based on only about 40% of total ODA commitments from OECD/DAC countries, as it poverty reduction both nationally and internationally excludes technical co-operation and administrative costs, as well as all ODA from Austria, Luxembourg, New Zealand and the United States that do not report the tying status of their ODA.

Target 8.B Address the special needs of the least developed countries Indicator 8.Includes: tariff and quota free access for least developed countries ODA received in landlocked developing countries as a proportion of exports; enhanced programme of debt relief for HIPC and cancellation their gross national incomes of official bilateral debt; and more generous ODA for countries Landlocked developing countries committed to poverty reduction 1990 2003 2004 2005 Target 8.C Percentage of recipients GNIs 6.4 8.0 7.9 7.0 6.Address the special needs of landlocked developing countries and In billion US $ 6.9 11.8 13.8 14.7 16.small island developing States (through the Programme of Action for the Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing States and Indicator 8.the outcome of the twenty-second special session of the General ODA received in small island developing states as a proportion of their Assembly) gross national incomes Small islands developing states Target 8.D Deal comprehensively with the debt problems of developing countries 1990 2003 2004 2005 through national and international measures in order to make debt Percentage of recipients GNIs 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.sustainable in the long term In billion US $ 2.1 1.8 2.0 2.5 2.Official development assistance (ODA) Indicator 8.Market access Net ODA, total and to the least developed countries, as a percentage of OECD/DAC donors gross national income Indicator 8.Proportion of total developed country imports (by value and excluding (a) Annual total assistance1/, US$ billions arms) from developing countries and least developed countries, (p) 1993 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 admitted free of duty All developing countries 56.1 58.3 69.1 79.4 107.1 104.4 103.Percentage of total developed country imports LDCs 14.0 15.9 22.6 23.5 24.6 29.4 (p) preliminary data 1996 1998 2000 2003 2006 (p) 1/ Includes non-ODA debt forgiveness but excludes forgiveness of debt for military purposes.

(a) Excluding arms Developing countries 53 54 63 71 (b) Share of OECD/DAC donors gross national income, percentage LDCs 68 81 75 81 (p) 1993 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 (b) Excluding arms and oil All developing countries 0.30 0.23 0.25 0.26 0.33 0.31 0. Developing countries 54 54 65 71 LDCs 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 - LDCs 78 78 70 78 (p) preliminary data (p) preliminary data Indicator 8.Proportion of total bilateral, sector-allocable ODA of OECD/DAC donors to basic social services (basic education, primary health care, nutrition, safe water and sanitation) All OECD/DAC donors 1997 2000 2002 2004 Percentage of bilateral, sector6.8 14.1 18.0 15.9 21.allocable aid In billion US $ 2.1 4.3 5.6 7.7 12.Debt sustainability Indicator 8.Indicator 8.Average tariffs imposed by developed countries on agricultural Total number of countries that have reached their HIPC decision products and textiles and clothing from developing countries points and number that have reached their HIPC completion points (cumulative) Percentage 1996 1998 2000 2003 Number of countries (a) Agricultural goods 20001/ 20082/ Developing countries 10.5 10.0 9.3 9.4 8. Reached completion point 1 LDCs 4.0 3.6 3.7 2.8 2. Reached decision point but not completion point 21 (b) Textiles Yet to be considered for decision point 13 Developing countries 7.3 7.0 6.6 5.8 5. Total eligible countries 35 1/ LDCs 4.5 4.3 4.1 3.5 3. As of March 2001. Only includes countries that are HIPC in 2008.

2/ As of June 2008.

(c) Clothing Developing countries 11.4 11.2 10.8 9.7 8.Indicator 8. LDCs 8.1 8.0 7.8 7.0 6.4 Debt relief committed under HIPC and MDRI initiative Debt relief committed under HIPC and MDRI initiatives (US$ billions, cumulative)1/ Indicator 8.2000 Agricultural support estimate for OECD countries as a percentage of To countries that reached decision or completion point 28 their gross domestic product 1/ Expressed in end-2006 net present value terms. Commitment status as of June 2008.

Agriculture support estimate in OECD countries 1990 2003 2004 2005 2006 (p) Indicator 8.As percentage of OECD Debt service as a percentage of exports of goods and services countries GDP 2.02 1.17 1.15 1.07 0.Debt service as a percentage of exports of goods and services and net income from abroad1/ In billion US $ 321 352 388 382 1990 1995 2000 (p) preliminary data Developing Regions 18.6 14.3 12.5 6.Indicator 8.9 Northern Africa 39.9 22.7 15.4 8.Proportion of ODA provided to help build trade capacity Sub-Saharan Africa 11.4 10.5 9.4 5.Trade-related technical assistance/capacity-building (TRTA/CB) as a percent Latin America and the Caribbean 20.6 18.7 21.8 14.of total sector allocable ODA Eastern Asia 10.5 9.0 5.1 0.2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Southern Asia 17.7 26.9 13.7 4. World 3.3 3.2 3.6 2.5 3.0 3. South-Eastern Asia 16.7 7.9 6.5 5. Western Asia 24.2 18.4 14.2 12. Oceania 14.0 7.8 5.9 1.Commonwealth of Independent States 0.62/ 6.1 8.1 7.Commonwealth of Independent States, Asia 0.62/ 3.8 8.4 1.Commonwealth of Independent States, Europe 0.62/ 6.2 8.1 8.Transition countries of South-Eastern Europe 9.4 11.7 11.8 5.Least Developed Countries (LDCs) 16.7 13.3 11.6 6.1/ Includes countries reporting to the World Banks Debtor Reporting System, Aggregates are based on available data and for some years might exclude countries that do not have data on exports of goods and services and net income from abroad.

2/ Data are for 1993.

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 12 | 13 ||



2011 www.dissers.ru -

, .
, , , , 1-2 .