Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 71 | 72 || 74 | 75 |   ...   | 85 |

TUNISIA FREEDOM HOUSE Freedom on the Net TURKEY 2009 POPULATION: 73.6 million INTERNET FREEDOM Partly Partly INTERNET PENETRATION: 36 percent STATUS Free Free WEB 2.0 APPLICATIONS BLOCKED: Yes Obstacles to Access 12 SUBSTANTIAL POLITICAL CENSORSHIP: Yes Limits on Content 14 BLOGGERS/ONLINE USERS ARRESTED: No Violations of User Rights 16 PRESS FREEDOM STATUS: Partly Free Total 42 INTRODUCTION Internet and mobile-telephone use in Turkey has grown significantly in recent years, though access remains a challenge in some parts of the country, particularly the southeast. The government had a hands-off approach to regulation of the internet until 2001, but it has since taken considerable legal steps to limit access to certain information, including some political content. According to various estimates, there were over 5,000 blocked websites as of July 2010, spurring street demonstrations against internet censorship.1 A related and significant threat to online freedom has been the repeated blocking of certain applications, particularly file-sharing sites like YouTube, Last.fm, and Metacafe. Over the last two years, users of these sites have filed cases with the European Court of Human Rights, after unsuccessfully appealing the ban in local courts. The YouTube block was lifted in November 2010 only after disputed videos were removed or made unavailable within the country.

Despite the restrictive legal environment, the Turkish blogosphere is surprisingly vibrant and diverse. Bloggers have critiqued even sensitive government policies and sought to raise public awareness about censorship and surveillance practices, yielding at least one parliamentary inquiry into the latter.

Internet use in Turkey became popular in the mid-1990s with the introduction of home dial-up connection services. Since then, the number of dial-up usersand since the number of ADSL broadband usershas grown considerably. The government in launched the E-Transformation Turkey Project, which aims to ensure the transition to an information society.

Yigal Schleifer, Turkish Internet Users Taking It to the Streets, Eurasianet.org, http://www.eurasianet.org/node/61553.

TURKEY FREEDOM HOUSE Freedom on the Net OBSTACLES TO ACCESS Despite an increasing penetration rate in the last few years, obstacles to internet access remain. According to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Turkey had approximately 26.4 million internet users in 2009, for a 35 percent penetration rate.2 Turk Telekom announced that it reached 6.5 million broadband users in May 2010. The number of mobile-telephone subscriptions in 2009 was nearly 63 million, for a penetration rate of some 84 percent,3 and third-generation (3G) data connections have been offered by all mobile-phone operators since June 2009. Although many people access the internet from workplaces, universities, and internet cafes, poor infrastructureincluding limited telecommunication services and even lack of electricity in certain areas, especially in the eastern and southeastern regionshas a detrimental effect on citizens ability to connect, particularly from home. High though decreasing prices, bandwidth caps, and a lack of technical literacy, especially among older Turks, also inhibit wider internet use. Bandwidth capping has become standard practice and formed part of the broadband services offered by major providers during 2010.

The population generally enjoys widespread access to internet technology, and diverse news sources are available to users. Popular social networks such as Facebook and MySpace, and other applications like Skype, can be used in Turkish. However, the government routinely blocks advanced web content and applications including video- and music-sharing sites such as YouTube, MySpace, Last.fm, Metacafe, and Dailymotion; bloghosting sites like WordPress and Blogspot; Google groups; and the photo-sharing website Slide. In the case of YouTube alone, access was blocked roughly 20 times between March 2007 and November 2010. The block instituted in May 2008 was lifted in October 2010, only to be re-instated a few days later, then again lifted.4 The video sharing site Vimeo was blocked in September 2010. In most instances, these large-scale shutdowns have been blunt efforts to halt the circulation of specific content that is deemed undesirable or illegal by the government. Circumvention tools are widely used to access blocked websites, and the government has not restricted their use to date.

There are 117 internet-service providers (ISPs) in Turkey, but the majority act as resellers for the dominant, partly state-owned Turk Telekom, which provides more than International Telecommunication Union (ITU), ICT Statistics 2009Internet, http://www.itu.int/ITUD/ICTEYE/Indicators/Indicators.aspx#, accessed June 15, 2010.

ITU, ICT Statistics 2009Mobile Cellular Subscriptions, http://www.itu.int/ITUD/ICTEYE/Indicators/Indicators.aspx#, accessed June 15, 2010.

Marc Champion, Turkey Blocks, Unblocks YouTube, Wall Street Journal, November 2, 2010, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704462704575590420251199614.html. See also, YouTube Removed Videos of Former Opposition Leader, Bianet.org, November 10, 2010, http://bianet.org/english/freedom-ofexpression/125993-youtube-removed-videos-of-former-opposition-leader.

TURKEY FREEDOM HOUSE Freedom on the Net percent of the broadband access in the country. Liberalization of local telephony is still pending, and the delay undermines competition in the fixed-line and broadband markets.

ISPs are required by law to submit an application for an activity certificate from the Telecommunications Communication Presidency (TIB), a regulatory body, before they can offer services. Internet cafes are also subject to regulation and registration. Those operating without an activity certificate from a local authority representing the central administration may face fines of 3,000 to 15,000 lira ($1,900 to $9,600). Mobile-phone service providers are subject to licensing through a regulatory authority, and a licensing fee set by the cabinet.

The Information and Communication Technologies Authority and the TIB, which it oversees, act as the regulators for all of these technologies and are well staffed and selffinanced.5 However, the fact that board members are government appointees is a potential threat to the authoritys independence, and its decision-making process is not transparent.

Nonetheless, there have been no reported instances of activity certificates being denied. TIB also oversees the application of the countrys website-blocking law, and is often criticized by pressure groups for a lack of transparency. The Computer Center of Middle East Technical University has been responsible for managing domain names since 1991. Unlike in many other countries, individuals in Turkey are not permitted to register and own .com.tr and .org.tr domain names unless they own a company or a civil society organization with the same name as the requested domain.

LIMITS ON CONTENT Government censorship of the internet is relatively common and has increased in recent years. In May 2007, the government enacted Law No. 5651, entitled Regulation of Publications on the Internet and Suppression of Crimes Committed by Means of Such Publication, which proscribes the responsibilities of content providers, hosting companies, mass-use providers, and ISPs.6 Its most important provision allows the blocking of websites that contain certain types of content, including material that shows or promotes sexual exploitation and abuse of children, obscenity, prostitution, or gambling. Also targeted for blocking are websites deemed to insult Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, modern Turkeys founding father. Domestically hosted websites with proscribed content can be taken down, and those based abroad can be blocked and filtered through ISPs. A January 2010 report by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) estimated that 3,700 websites Information and Communication Technologies Authority, http://www.tk.gov.tr/Eng/english.htm.

Law No 5651 was published on the Turkish Official Gazette on 23.05.2007, No. 26030.

TURKEY FREEDOM HOUSE Freedom on the Net had been blocked as of December 2009, the number of which seems to have grown to about 5,000 by mid 2010. The procedures surrounding decisions to block websites, whether by the courts or the TIB, are nontransparent, creating significant challenges for those seeking to appeal.

Judges can issue blocking orders during preliminary investigations as well as during trials.

The reasoning behind court decisions is not provided in blocking notices, and the relevant rulings are not easily accessible. As a result, it is often difficult for site owners to determine why their site has been blocked and which court issued the order. The TIBs mandate includes executing judicial blocking orders, but it can also issue such orders under its own authority for certain content. Moreover, it has in some cases successfully asked content and hosting providers to remove offending items from their servers, allowing it to avoid issuing a blocking order that would affect an entire website. According to TIB statistics as of May 2009, the courts are responsible for 21 percent of blocked websites, while 79 percent are blocked administratively by the TIB. The regulator has refused to publish blocking statistics since May 2009, and legal proceedings are under way to force the release of the data under Turkeys freedom of information law.Two groups, the All Internet Association (TID) and the Turkish Informatics Association (TBD), have brought cases to the Council of State in an effort to annul as unconstitutional all the secondary regulations drawn up on the basis of Law No. 5651. The TID has particularly faulted the TIBs authority to issue administrative blocking orders without judicial involvement. The cases were still pending as of June 2010.

Although Law No. 5651 was designed to protect children from illegal and harmful internet content, its broad application to date has effectively restricted adults access to legal content. In some instances, the courts have blocked websites for political content using other laws. For example, access to the websites of several alternative news sources such as Atilim, zgr Gndem, Keditr, Gnlk Gazetesi, and Firat News Agency are blocked indefinitely by the courts. Access to the website of Richard Dawkins a British etiologist, evolutionary biologist, and popular science writer has been blocked since September after a pro-creationist Islamist claimed that the website contents had insulted him, his work, and his religion. The website of El Mundo, a Spanish newspaper, has been banned in Turkey since April 2010 because of a single video clip deemed to be illegal.

Certain leftist and pro-Kurdish news websites are blocked consistently,9 especially those dealing with southeastern Turkey, home to most of the countrys Kurdish population.

Additionally, Gabile.com and Hadigayri.com, which together form the largest online gay Yaman Akdeniz, Report of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media on Turkey and Internet Censorship (Vienna: OSCE, January 2010), http://www.osce.org/documents/rfm/2010/01/42294_en.pdf. Also see OSCE Calls on Turkey to Stop Blocking YouTube, Reuters, June 22, 2010, http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE65L3MP20100622.

Reporters Without Borders, Telecom Authority Accused of Concealing Blocked Website Figures, news release, May 19, 2010, http://en.rsf.org/turkey-telecom-authority-accused-of-19-05-2010,37511.html.

Yaman Akdeniz, Report of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media on Turkey and Internet Censorship (Vienna: OSCE, January 2010), http://www.osce.org/documents/rfm/2010/01/42294_en.pdf.

TURKEY FREEDOM HOUSE Freedom on the Net community in Turkey with approximately 225,000 users, were also blocked for approximately seven days during 2009 by order of the TIB. Access to popular sites such as MySpace.com, Last.fm, and Justin.tv has been blocked on the basis of intellectual-property infringement.In June 2010 Turkish activists initiated a legal challenge against the governments controversial move to block Google related services, which left millions of internet users frustrated. This was a reaction to 44 IP addresses jointly used by YouTube and Google being initially blocked by the TIB, and then by the Ankaras 1st Criminal Court of Peace. The reason behind the IP address blocking was to make it even harder to access YouTube from Turkey (which had been already blocked since May 2008) but the IP blocking paralyzed access to numerous Google-related services such as Analytics, Translate, Docs, Books, Map, and Earth. However, following the unblocking of YouTube in November 2010, access to other Google services was restored.

Despite the large number of sites blocked, circumvention techniques and technologies are widely available, enabling even inexperienced users to avoid filters and blocks. Each time a new order is issued and a popular website is blocked, a large number of articles are published to instruct users on how to access the banned websites. In a sign of the extent of this phenomenon, even during the 2.5-year block, YouTube was still the eightmost-accessed site in Turkey.11 In July 2010, Internet users organized a major protest against Internet censorship, the first of its kind. The protest gathered approximately 2,people in Istanbul who demanded the abolishment of Law No. 5651.Turkish users are increasingly relying on internet-based publications as a primary source of news. There is a wide range of blogs and websites on which citizens question and critique Turkish politics and leaders, including on issues that are generally viewed as politically sensitive. The majority of civil society groups maintain an online presence, and social-networking sites such as Facebook, FriendFeed, and especially the microblogging platform Twitter are used for a variety of functions, including political campaigns. Thus far, however, mobile phones and short-message service (SMS, or text messaging) technology do not seem to play a large role in social or political mobilization.

In March 2010, a law professor filed a case at the European Court of Human Rights in a bid to lift the October 2009 block on Last.fm.

According to Alexa, a web information company, as of August 26, 2010, http://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/TR.

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 71 | 72 || 74 | 75 |   ...   | 85 |

2011 www.dissers.ru -

, .
, , , , 1-2 .