Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 2 | 3 ||

22. N. Koch, A. Kraus, C. Cachero, S. Meli. Integration of BusiLiterature ness Processes in Web Applications Models // Journal of 1. G. Booch, J. Rumbaugh, I. Jacobson. The Unified Modeling Web Engineering, 3(1), 2004. p. 22-49.

Language: Users Guide. SPb.: DMK, 2007. 496 p. 23. J.P. Lopez-Grao, J. Merseguer, J. Campos. Performance en2. A.M. Vendrov. Methods and tools of business processes gineering based on UML & SPNs: A software performance modeling // Jetinfo. 2004. 10 (137). tool. In Proc. of 7th Int. Symposium On Computer and Informa3. A.A. Emelianov. Simulation in the risk-management. St. Pe- tion Sciences (ISCIS), CRC Press, October 2002. p. 405-409.

tersburg: SPbGIEA, 2000. 376 p. 24. M. Marzolla, S. Balsamo. UML-PSI: The UML Performance 4. J.F. Telnov. Business-process reengineering. M.: Finansy i SImulator, Proc. of the First International Conference on the Statistika, 2004. 320 p. Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST 2004), IEEE 5. G.N. Khubaev, S.M. Shcherbakov. Integration of visual and Computer Society.- Enschede, The Netherlands, September simulation modeling of business-processes of the enterprise: 27-30, 2004. p. 340-341.

principles and toolkit // Problems of modern economics, 25. O. Noran. Business modeling UML vs. IDEF.: Griffith.: Griffith 3(27). 2008. pp. 252-258. University, 2003.

6. G.N. Khubaev, S.M. Shcherbakov. The features of application 26. Pan-Wei Ng Business Process Modeling and Simulation with of the UML language for simulation // Problems of federal and UML // Rational Edge, 2002 Apr, May.

regional economy. Scientific notes. Issue 9. Rostov-Don: 27. Performance by Unified Model Analysis (PUMA) by Murray RSEU RINH, 2006. p. 99-113. Woodside, Dorina C. Petriu, Dorin B. Petriu, Hui Shen, To7. S.N. Shirobokova, S.M. Shcherbakov. The abilities of the qeer Israr, Jose Merseguer // WOSP05, July 1115, 2005, method and the program complex of the business processes Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

simulation models automated synthesis // Computer modeling 28. D.C. Petriu, H. Shen. Applying the UML performance profile: graph 2008: proceedings of the international scientific and technical grammarbased derivation of LQN models from UML specifications, conference, June 24, 2008. St. Petersburg: Publishing in Computer Performance Evaluation / TOOLS, Eds. T. Field, P.G.

house of polytechnic university, 2008. p. 259-268. Harrison, J. Bradley, and U. Harder, in Lecture Notes in Computer 8. L.B. Arief and N.A. Speirs. A UML tool for an automatic gen- Science 2324 (Springer, 2002).

eration of simulation programs. In Proceedings of the 2nd In- 29. R.J. Pooley and P.J.B. King. (1999, February). The Unified ternational Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP Modeling Language and performance engineering. In IEE 2000). Ottawa, Canada, 17-20 September 2000. p. 71-76. Proceedings Software, Vol. 146. p. 2-10.

9. S. Balsamo, M. Marzolla. Simulation Modeling of UML Software 30. H. Richter, L. Mrz Toward a standard process: the use of Architectures, Proceedings of the European Simulation Multi- UML for designing simulation models. Winter Simulation Conconference, Nottingham. UK, Jun 9-11 2003, Edited by David ference 2000. p.394-398.

Al-Dabass, SCS-European Publishing House. p. 562-567. 31. SIMFONE: an object-oriented simulation framework by Ros10. S. Balsamo, M. Simeoni. On Transforming UML models into setti M.D., Aylor B., Jacoby R., Prorock A., White A. Proceedperformance models Technical Report Saladin Project R- ings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference Joines J.A., SAL-51, WTUML: Workshop on Transformations in UML, Barton R.R., Kang K., and Fishwick P.A., eds. Institute of ETAPS 2001 Satellite Event. Genova, Italy, April 7th, 2001. Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jer11. J. Barjis. The importance of business process modeling in sey. p. 1855-1864.

software systems design // Science of Computer Program- 32. A. Teilans, A. Kleins, Y. Merkuryev, A. Grinbergs. Design of ming, Vol. 71, Issue 1 (March 2008). p. 7387. UML models and their simulation using ARENA // WSEAS 12. Barjis J., Shishkov B. UML based business systems modeling Transactions on Computer Research Vol. 3, Issue 1 (January and simulation // Proceedings of EUROSIM 2001 June 26 2008). . 67-73.

29, 2001 Aula Conference Centre Delft, The Netherlands. 33. Towards Simulation-Based Performance Modeling of UML 13. A. Bourouis, B. Belattar. JAPROSIM: A Java Framework for specifications. Technical Report CS-2003-2 By Simonetta BalDiscrete Event Simulation, in Journal of Object Technology, samo, Mattia Grosso and Moreno Marzolla (Dipartimento di InVol. 7, No. 1, January-February 2008. p. 103-119. formatica Universit`a Ca Foscari di Venezia via Torino, Italy).

14. N. Castela, J. Tribolet, A. Silva, A. Guerra. Business process Keywords modeling with UML, Proc. 3rd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Setubal, Portugal, 2001.

Simulation; business process; analysis; integration of 15. B. Copstein, C.E. Pereira, F.R. Wagner. The Object-Oriented visual modeling and simulation; meta-model; UML; diaApproach and the Event Discrete Simulation Paradigms. In:

gram; computer-aided construction; SIM-UML; estimation 10th European Simulation Multiconference. Budapest, Hunof resource expenses.

gary, June 1996. Proceedings, Society for Computer Simulation, 1996.- pp. 57-61.

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 2 | 3 ||

2011 www.dissers.ru -

, .
, , , , 1-2 .